From October 17 to 20, 2023, developed countries led by the United States of America held their ground, insisting that they must have total control over this fund, which they say is being established for developing countries.

Many experts including Harjeet Singh, the Head of Global and Political Strategy of the Climate Action Network (CAN), saw this resolution as a complete disappointment. This insistence by the U.S and her allies is nothing short of an attempt to exert control over developing countries.

By trying so hard to force developing countries to accept that the Loss and Damage Fund must be domiciled within the World Bank – an institution long seen by developing countries as serving the interests of developed countries – developed countries led by the United States and Switzerland have once again showed that, for them, climate action is not about justice and corrections of the mistakes of the past, but more about them exercising powers over anything and everything in the world.

Historically, emissions by developed countries created the climate crisis. Furthermore, those emissions were used by developed countries to boost their technological progress giving them an advantage when it comes to control and access to finance and technologies needed to cut down emissions. Having exploited the common resources of the entire world to get to this point, it is only a fair that they should support poor countries who are bearing the impact of the climate crisis to grow in a more sustainable way.

Nonetheless, these countries have continuously refused to make the basic compromises required to build trust in the international process and encourage developing countries to pursue low-carbon development. First, they failed to meet the $100 billion annual support agreed to in 2009 to assist developing countries by 2020, next they tried to pass of high interest loans as part of the effort to meet the $100 billion pledge. And now, this bull-headed decision to have control of the Loss and Damage Fund with the usual conditions to make sure that access becomes extremely difficult for those who need adds salt into the wounds of developing countries.

Let us be clear, the funding expected from rich countries either as part of the Green Climate Fund, Adaptation Fund, or the Loss and Damage Fund, should not be viewed as charity.  Instead, they are essentially tokens from massive profits made by developing countries from destroying the earth. It is as simple as that. While the language of compensation is not explicitly used in the UNFCCC texts, that is essentially what it is, and the fact that poor countries agreed to expunge compensation language from the text is already enough demonstration of compromise and good will by the Global South.

Confronted with the stark reality of climate change, and constantly reminded by developed countries that they must take action to address climate change, developing countries have since committed to follow the low-carbon development path hoping that those who destroyed the earth would at least live up to their own words and provide the agreed financial support necessary to encourage mitigation and adaptation efforts, and also support for Loss and Damage.

Yet, all poor countries continue to get is warm words and empty promises.  It is instructive that as soon as the Ukraine-Russian war hit, and energy became a problem in Europe, developing countries that had been told by rich countries to divest from fossil fuel and make net zero transition plans watched as Europe made a dash for gas in Africa and had coal-powered energy industries were reactivated in Germany!

The Loss and Damage Fund therefore presented a clear opportunity for developed countries to, for once, build trust and defer to what works for those whom the fund is being set up for. But as usual, they have re-emphasized that for them, it is only about what benefits them, and not what is best for the long-term good of the world.

By Chukwumerije Okereke and Nnaemeka Oruh

Prof Chukwumerije Okereke is Professor of Global Governance and Public Policy at the University of Bristol

Nnaemeka Oruh is Senior Policy Analysts with the Society for Planet and Prosperity, Nigeria

Original from: https://www.environewsnigeria.com/deadlocked-loss-and-damage-funding-rich-countries-trample-on-equity-and-trust-in-global-climate-agreement/

Established in 2009, AgDevCo’s vision is a thriving commercial African agriculture sector that benefits people, economies, and the environment. The organisation contributes to this goal by providing investment capital and technical assistance to grow sustainable and impactful businesses across the agricultural value chain. In doing so, it aims to promote resilience, gender equality and the production of better-quality, more nutritious food.

This new funding builds on the original endowment funding provided by the UK government which helped establish AgDevCo over the past decade. This endowment has provided capital to agribusinesses that have directly created or sustained more than 15,000 jobs and to work with 750,000 smallholder farmers to help increase their income and improve their resilience to climate change. It has also allowed AgDevCo to build a capability and track record to the point where it can secure external investment capital.

In welcoming the investment, Keith Palmer, AgDevCo’s founder and Chairman, said: “Securing investment from CDC, Norfund and DFC is a major milestone in AgDevCo’s history. It is a strong endorsement of AgDevCo’s team and our strategy. We are excited that our vision is shared by our new funders, who recognise the important contribution that AgDevCo investments can make to productivity, sustainability, and inclusivity in Africa. Their funding marks the beginning of a partnership in which AgDevCo will use its sector specialism, drawing on our new funders’ networks and resources, to increase the number of impactful investments in African agriculture.”

UK Minister for Africa, Vicky Ford, said: “I am proud to see how AgDevCo’s investing has boosted sustainable agriculture across Sub-Saharan Africa over the past 10 years, including deepening impact on smallholder farmers and SMEs. This new investment will bring continued growth, by enabling agribusiness SMEs to expand, improve farmer incomes, create new jobs and strengthen climate resilience across Africa.”

Tenbite Ermias, CDC’s Managing Director for Africa, said: “This investment reinforces our long-term commitment to investing in key sectors in Africa including agriculture, which is critical for creating jobs, promoting gender equality and supporting people to build a better life for themselves and their families. Furthermore, it reflects our continued focus on climate finance which is central to our new strategy over the next five-year period, to support emerging economies that are most vulnerable to the impacts of the climate emergency.”

Ellen Cathrine Rasmussen, Executive Vice President of Scalable Enterprises in Norfund, said: “Norfund is very pleased to partner with AgDevCo to deliver on our joint mission: to create jobs and improve lives by investing in businesses that drive sustainable development. A thriving commercial African agriculture sector is vital for economic growth and job creation. More than half of Sub-Saharan Africa’s population work in agriculture, yet Africa does not produce enough food to feed the continent. The investment in AgDevCo will create jobs, increase food production, improve climate change resilience, and promote gender equality. The AgDevCo team’s skills, networks and achievements are impressive – and we look forward to working with them.”

Algene Sajery, DFC’s Vice President of External Affairs and Head of Global Gender Equity Initiatives, said: “DFC is thrilled to support AgDevCo with a $20 million loan to bring additional capital to smallholder farmers and agricultural businesses in Africa, promoting food security for lower-income communities across the continent. DFC’s loan, alongside financing from our partner DFIs, will enable AgDevCo to link more farmers to markets and create jobs for underserved populations, with a focus on women farmers.”

Time is running out to fulfil the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and ensure an equitable world for the next generation. Success will require an eye-watering amount of money – between US$5-US$7 trillion a year, according to a World Bank report.

In more positive news, there has been an increasing shift in mindset as investors adopt SDG-aligned impact investing strategies, which means more private capital is being allocated towards these 17 global targets. Encouragingly, 85% of 440 impact investors assessed by the Global Impact Investing Network (GIIN) in 2021 said their impact investment strategies focus on SDG-alignment.

But the next step is more difficult. How do investors measure the extent to which their capital is making a real-world difference?

Impact investing is when investors funnel capital into companies that are having a positive effect on the environment or society around them. To qualify as an impact investor, investments must have a measurement system in place, the International Finance Corporation (IFC) noted in a recent report. Worringly, the IFC highlighted that just a quarter of the US$2.3 trillion impact market in 2020 operated under a clear impact management system.

This is because understanding of how to quantify real-world outcomes of financial contributions to SDGs is still in its infancy.

“Investors want to stop guessing on impact,” says Lissa Glasgo, Senior Manager of impact measurement platform IRIS+ and Impact Measurement and Management at GIIN. “They want to be making impact-based decisions with the same rigour and quality of evidence as they do for risk and return-based decisions.”

Pressure is mounting for those tracking climate-related SDGs, as 2030 is also a significant milestone for investors, companies and governments that have set ambitious decarbonisation targets on the way to net zero greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 2050.

To accelerate action, policymakers are beginning to ask companies and investors to disclose their impact on society and the environment, adopting a double materiality lens.

Standardised, high-quality impact reporting is still a long way down the road, experts say. Getting there will require further collaboration between investors, standards-setters, data providers and policymakers to navigate the complexities surrounding impact measurement.

As reporting requirements yield the required data, investor demand will increase for comprehensive impact measurement methodologies, tools and frameworks. This is where organisations and initiatives such as GIIN, the Impact Taskforce (ITF) and Impact Management Platform (IMP) come into play.

Metrics and models

There are a number of barriers preventing impact investors from accurately measuring and modelling their contributions to the SDGs. Most obviously, these goals were not designed primarily with investors in mind and so aren’t easily quantifiable.

For example, SDG 13 (climate action) can be measured according to the number of investee companies that have made net zero commitments, but how do investors track their impact against SDG 16 (peace, justice and strong institutions)?

Even when metrics are straightforward, impact still isn’t so cut and dry. After all, how does the investor know an investee company set a net zero target as a direct result of its influence? If the company was under pressure from multiple investors, the public and its domestic government (as is most likely the case), who’s to say who had the biggest impact?

“Investors are currently trying to understand what kind of information they need, what relevant information is already being reported, and how impact-related information should inform decision-making,” says Peter Paul van der Wijs, Chief External Affairs Officer at the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). “It’s definitely challenging.”

An unsurprising hurdle is the inconsistencies in third-party sustainability data, says Nick Parsons, Head of Research and ESG at specialist infrastructure investment firm ThomasLloyd. “A lot of asset owners and managers are trying to measure their impact at an arm’s length by relying on third-party vendors, which simply doesn’t work with this kind of strategy,” he says.

“Being a direct investor means we owns a stake in companies, so we can more easily get hold of proprietary data. As we have tracked SDG-related data since 2015, we know our impact over time.”

A number of asset owners and managers measure contributions to SDGs through investee companies’ revenues, according to a GIIN report. However, interviewees admitted that “the SDG revenue-alignment approach is […] insufficient in speaking to the outcomes or impact associated with the investments”. Instead, there is a demand to shift to more “standardised metrics”.

But a number of the impact measurement tools introducing standardised metrics are still in the “early stages of development” and therefore not yet useful to investors, according to a report by the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF). In theory, investors can already compare their own portfolio impacts to benchmarks and other portfolios, WWF noted, adding that company laggards can be identified by comparing their SDG commitments and progress to competitors, i.e., identifying how many of the company’s direct competitors have publicly committed to the SDGs and outlined which goals are their priority.

Of course, this is assuming companies are providing investors with decision-useful information in the first place.

Standards-setter GRI recently published its findings following analysis of 200 companies’ approaches to SDGs. While four in five committed to the SDGs within their sustainability reports, less than half set measurable targets outlining how their actions are contributing to the goals, the report said.

In response, the GRI has outlined a series of recommendations for companies making commitments to the SDGs, including meeting stakeholder demands for transparency on negative impacts, making SDG performance data accessible by using recognised frameworks, and disclosing targets outlining how they plan to support the SDGs.

Asset managers are continuing to struggle to analyse data from investee companies using different disclosure frameworks, meaning they cannot accurately work out the overall impact of the fund, Cliff Prior, CEO of the Global Steering Group for Impact Investment (GSG), tells ESG Investor.

“Likewise, an asset owner using multiple asset managers across its impact investments – who are likely all providing differing data – has the same problem,” he adds.

Too many options?

Nonetheless, there are a number of platforms and initiatives offering guidance to help investors get started on their journey towards aligning their impact strategies with the SDGs.

“Investors are coming to us every day, saying that they want to drive impact and they need XYZ data to be able to understand what their impact even looks like and what targets they need to set moving forward,” says GIIN’s Glasgo.

The network’s COMPASS methodology gives practical examples of how investors can measure their impact across the SDGs. For instance, investors tracking SDG 6 (clean water and sanitation) can measure the percentage increase (or decrease) in the number of people accessing clean drinking water compared to the previous year. This can then be compared to the rate of increase in access to clean drinking water that is required to achieve SDG 6.1: universal access to clean water.

IRIS+, also run by GIIN, was originally set up as a “dictionary of impact metrics”, explains Glasgo. However, recognising investors’ growing need for a single source of information and guidance on assessing impact, the platform evolved and began aligning with multiple frameworks, generating over 700 metrics covering a variety of standards – including the SDGs.

“If an investor is tracking the SDGs, they can select the specific goals they are focused on and then IRIS+ outlines the recommended metric approach for them,” she says.

For private equity funds, bonds and enterprises, the UN also offers the SDGs Impact Standards framework, which provides best practice guidance and self-assessment tools to align internal processes and practices with contributions to the SDGs.

With funding from the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA), the GRI also updated its disclosure standards, outlining how corporates can align their GRI disclosures with the SDGs.

Building on the work of the Impact Management Project, in 2021 the 2° Investing Initiative (2DII) consulted on and created an impact investment framework. Finalised in November, its Climate Impact Management System provides investors with guidelines on how to devise, refine and communicate about impactful climate strategies.

Further, advisors and consultants are working with impact investors on SDG alignment. Pensions for Purpose, an impact-focused advisor to pension funds uses SDGs as a framework for discussion with clients on their sustainable investment beliefs and priorities.

Despite impact data remaining unstandardised, investors are proving they can partially measure SDG contributions for themselves.

The Sustainable Development Investments (SDI) platform is run by asset owners and supported by index provider Qontigo. Powered by AI-driven technology, SDI has so far analysed over 8,000 companies globally on their existing contributions to the SDGs. It identifies which SDGs companies within an asset owner’s portfolio have committed to, mapping the portfolio’s overall exposure to the 17 goals according to companies’ reported areas of focus. Asset owners involved include PGGM, AustralianSuper and APG.

Bespoke approaches proliferate among asset managers, too. Morgan Stanley Investment Management (MSIM) identifies one or two relevant SDGs it believes are relevant to an investee company’s business model, according to Vikram Raju, Head of Impact Investing for MSIM AIP Private Markets. From there, the firm creates a contractual obligation for this data to be reported by the company in question at a reasonable periodic interval so MSIM can capture any meaningful changes.

“The key is avoiding overcomplicating the reporting ask, bearing in mind that smaller companies with limited resources will struggle to comply with onerous data tracking and reporting requirements,” he notes.

Having financed and developed five utility scale solar plants in Negros, in the Philippines, as well as three biomass energy plants, ThomasLloyd measures the impact of its investments independently, says Parsons. For example, the investment firm measures its contributions to SDG 7 (affordable and clean energy) by annually recording the number of houses in the local area that have access to electricity provided by the plants.

The firm also reports on the indirect contributions its investments are making to other SDGs. “In the Philippines, we contribute to SDG 11 (sustainable cities and communities) when paying local taxes,” says Parsons. “We look at how much tax we pay in the region every year and compare that to how total tax revenue is being generated and spent locally.”

Global standardisation

Of course, the most certain way to ensure companies are all providing the accurate and comparable impact-related data in the future is to mandate standardised reporting requirements and, ideally, a common methodology for impact assessment.

“Investors do have a role to play in asking for SDG impact-related information from corporates, but governments can have a lot of influence here – more are going to be asking for companies and investors to disclose their social and environmental impact,” says GRI’s van der Wijs.

The shift to double materiality-based sustainability reporting in the EU and the UK will increase the need for an alignment in existing impact and SDG standards, he notes.

The ITF – an independent, industry-led body of more than 100 businesses, investors and public policy institutions – recently called for the Group of Seven (G7) nations to mandate impacting accounting. The report outlined the importance of policymakers leading multilateral efforts to improve the transparency and integrity of disclosures around impact investment outcomes.

“The Taskforce has found that companies and investors are really interested in aligning standards around impact reporting,” says GSG’s Prior. “Ultimately, they recognise that there are investment opportunities in impact investing, and standardised reporting will help to unearth them.”

ITF further outlined proposals to stimulate the development of policies that would channel more capital into the SDGs, including increasing the supply of investment vehicles suitable for institutional investors and promoting the use of just transition principles to better integrate social and environmental objectives.

The WWF report also called on regulators and policymakers to mandate sustainability disclosures, and called for impact disclosures for financial products to better encourage financial institutions to adopt “robust and credible impact assessments”.

Other initiatives are working to improve interoperability. Launched in November 2021, the Impact Management Platform was developed to improve cohesion between existing standards as well as support industry impact-related dialogue with policymakers.

“IMP is ensuring that everybody – investors, standards-setters, regulators – are using the same language around impact, which is pivotal to driving improvement and growth,” says van der Wijs.

Coordinated by the Impact Management Project, a five-year consensus-building forum that ended in 2021, the platform hosts impact measurement and reporting resources provided by standards-setters and frameworks, such as the SDGs. Currently, the Organisation View for companies is now live, with the Investment View for asset owners and managers expected later this year.

“As the world moves towards greater cohesion on how to deeply and thoughtfully measure impact, we will see an emergence and strengthening in the impact-related data sources we need for investors to be able to make smarter SDG-oriented decisions,” says Glasgo.

By Emmy Hawker

Verdane, the European specialist growth equity investor, has announced that it has held a final close on Verdane Idun I (“Idun” or “the Fund”), an impact focused fund investing in technology-enabled businesses based out of Europe. The Fund is classified as “Article 9” under the European Union’s Finance Disclosure Regulation and closed at its hard cap of €300 million, over its target fund size of €225 million. With Idun, Verdane continues to demonstrate its commitment to driving positive impact through investments in ambitious companies whose impact scales with business growth.

The Fund has already made three investments: in Auntie, a digital provider of workplace wellbeing services; in Spond, a digital enabler of grassroot sports and physical health; and in a third business that contributes to a low-carbon society, to be announced in the next few weeks.

Bjarne Kveim Lie, Co-Founder and Managing Partner at Verdane commented: “We are delighted and humbled by the strong support from existing and new investors for Idun and would like to thank them for putting their trust in us. Today more than ever, there is a growing pool of opportunities to combine technology and sustainability, and we believe that investors like Verdane can take a leading role by supporting founders and management teams who can truly integrate sustainability into their business models and create value through impact. The success of the Idun fundraise reflects the continued development of the firm, and we are excited by the unique opportunities available to us on this journey to drive positive impact with our investments.”

The Fund counts leading institutions among its investors, including Nysnø Climate Investments, Norway’s state climate investment fund, AP3, one of Sweden’s main national pension funds, Adams Street Partners, a private markets investment management firm, and clients advised by Mercer.

Building on Verdane’s proven track record of investing in European tech-enabled sustainable businesses, Idun will make investments focused on driving impact in three clusters: energy transition; sustainable consumption; and resilient communities. The Fund will leverage technology to significantly scale portfolio companies’ impact, and Verdane’s background as a growth investor means the firm is uniquely positioned as a leader in this space.

Every investment that Idun makes will have to meet both financial and elevated impact criteria, with impact defined as addressing at least one of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and qualifying inside Verdane’s proprietary impact framework, built on the Impact Management Project. At the portfolio level, each Idun portfolio company will regularly report on bespoke sustainability KPIs and both the Fund’s ‘carried interest’ and credit facility are linked to goal attainment. The credit facility is issued by Nordea.

Idun received strong investor support from Verdane’s existing pool of LPs and is made up by a majority of institutional capital, including endowments, family offices and pensions funds.

Idun’s dedicated team combines entrepreneurial and impact investment experience and will be integrated with Verdane’s wider platform of over 90 investment professionals and its team of operational experts, Verdane Elevate, to create value and drive impact in the portfolio. The Fund is headed by partners Christian Jebsen and Erik Osmundsen, who will work alongside directors Reed Snyder and Karin Kans, and Sustainability Lead Axel Elmqvist.

Christian Jebsen, Partner at Verdane commented: “As we enter 2022 and announce the final close of Idun, we are seeing a very strong pipeline of potential investment opportunities across Northwestern Europe, as demonstrated by the Fund’s early deployments into three compelling and ambitious new portfolio companies. We believe that sustainability is an increasingly competitive strategy, especially as the growth and private equity industry is steadily moving towards a more impact-driven mindset. As both a technology and sustainability growth partner, Verdane is strongly positioned to add value and scale its partner businesses, and we look forward to working alongside management teams to drive positive impact.”

Verdane is one of the most active growth equity investors in Northwestern Europe, having completed 17 investments, of which four were portfolio deals, in 2021. Idun will sit alongside Verdane’s existing strategies, Capital and Edda, and represents an important initiative for the firm. The Fund will develop leading-edge, best practice frameworks and toolkits within the impact space that will help Verdane’s teams drive value across all of its strategies.

This independent, third-party funding will accelerate the expansion of Bowery’s network of smart indoor farms beyond the East Coast and brings its total debt and equity capital raised to more than $647 million — representing the strongest institutional backing in the Controlled Environmental Agriculture industry. KKR’s credit investment follows Bowery’s $325 million Series C funding in 2021 led by Fidelity Management & Research Company LLC.

The Company also announced today that it is building two new state-of-the-art farms serving the Atlanta, Georgia and Dallas-Fort Worth, Texas metro areas. The farms will create more than 200 year-round green jobs across both markets and provide locally grown produce to a population of 20 million and 16 million within a 200-mile radius of Locust Grove, Georgia and Arlington, Texas, respectively. Both farms are expected to open in the first quarter of 2023.

The two new farms, leveraging billions of data points collected from previous farms, will feature industry-leading tech innovations resulting in efficiency improvements to all elements of the grow environment, from LED lighting to water recapture to climate control, ultimately improving quality and yield. These farms represent a recommitment to Bowery’s sustainability goals; the company plans to use power from 100% renewable sources.

“We’re thrilled to announce our expansion beyond the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic regions,” said Irving Fain, CEO and Founder of Bowery Farming. “KKR’s support is a testament to the proven success of our business model and a strong vote of confidence in our technology leadership and ability to address critical challenges in the current agricultural system. There is enormous economic opportunity that comes with supporting our mission to democratize access to local, pesticide-free Protected Produce, and now we are ready to continue our growth more rapidly.”

The new financing will also provide resources to accelerate advancements in farm design and the BoweryOS, giving more communities access to a reliable supply of locally-grown produce, year-round. Bowery’s proprietary farm design and technology have been a key priority since the Company was founded and are at the heart of its efficient and scalable business model. The BoweryOS, the central nervous system of the business, integrates software, hardware, sensors, computer vision systems, AI, and robotics to orchestrate and automate the entirety of operations. Each new farm comes online in record speed, collectively benefitting from the power of the network and its billions of data points.

“We are excited to support Bowery’s pioneering efforts in vertical farming, which are directly contributing to the resiliency of our food supply,” said Michelle Hour, Director at KKR. “We believe that Bowery has the right commercial model, technology and team to capitalize on the rapidly growing consumer demand for sustainably-sourced food, and we look forward to helping the Company continue to innovate and scale to benefit communities across the United States.”

Bowery has continued to grow at a significant pace in 2021 and achieved a number of milestones; highlights include:

• More than doubling revenue
• Opening Farm X,  a state-of-the-art innovation hub for plant science in Kearny New Jersey, expanding R&D capacity by nearly 300%
• Transforming an industrial site in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania into a technologically advanced smart farm
• Breaking ground on two additional large-scale commercial farms in Locust Grove, Georgia (located in Henry County near Atlanta, home to rapid population and job growth) and Arlington, Texas (located in the center of the Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex, a rapidly growing technology and manufacturing hub)
• Expanding our reach to more than 800 stores through a partnership with Wakefern, the nation’s largest retailer-owned cooperative, including brands such as Gourmet Garage, Shoprite, Fairway, The Fresh Grocer, and Dearborn Market

Strong leadership, smart incentives and an inclusive approach are among the requirements if African nations are to successfully put the environment at the heart of their economic growth.

This was the finding of international researchers involved in a project led by the University of Reading. The Governing Inclusive Green Growth in Africa (GIGGA) Network is setting out a framework for robust assessment and understanding of green growth governance in Africa.

Professor Chuks Okereke, Professor of Environment and Development at the University of Reading, and project lead, said: “Green economy has immense potential in Africa, but it is an area that is very poorly understood in the continent due to a lack of research. There is an opportunity for many African countries to leapfrog more developed economies by integrating green schemes at this early stage in their growth.

“We are seeking to help countries put green initiatives at the centre of their development, by laying the foundations for an inclusive, structured approach to transforming economies.”

The research team assessed more than 950 academic literature and 500 high-profile economy activities in Africa, particularly in Ethiopia, Kenya, Nigeria, Rwanda and South Africa, to develop a research agenda on governing inclusive green growth in Africa to inform future ESRC and Global Challenges Research Fund (GCRF) funding activity. Inequality and poverty are still issues across the continent, while economic growth is still largely reliant on natural, non-renewable resources.

They identified five areas where more research is needed to identify opportunities and limitations for green growth for Africa’s economy:

• Infrastructural investment Infrastructure, such as roads, airports, housing and power stations, in many African countries is not adequate for the population, while many have limited access to electricity and clean water. A positive aspect is that there is little environmentally-damaging infrastructure to be replaced, offering a blank canvas for green development. New funding, both from public and private sources, is needed.
• Institution Most progress in pushing green growth in Africa so far has come from strong political will and leadership. It is a key research challenge to understand what model of governance allows such arrangements to work. Some deep-rooted laws and behaviours also need to be modernised.
• Incentives Many countries have plans, but few have been translated into policies with clear incentives and penalties. Workshops run by the project team identified a lack of ownership of green policies by African governments.
• Innovation Limited funding, infrastructure and human/technical capacity is currently hindering innovation, which is crucial for agriculture and waste management plans. Increased green innovation research capacity at universities and research institutions is needed. Most funding currently comes from Europe, which means research agendas may not be focused on African concerns.
• Inclusiveness There is currently large gap between the rich and poor in Africa, but green growth emphasises equity and social inclusion. For example, cooking and farming initiatives directly benefit poorer communities. Environmental initiatives are often at odds with social ones, and corruption in government and private sectors is an issue, so more research is needed to ensure green growth does not harm poorest communities.

The GIGGA Network was formed to respond to the Global Challenges Research Fund (GCRF) Strategic Networks call in 2016. It is a multidisciplinary research group, also including African think tanks, civil society organisations and government departments.

The Network is backed by £145,000 by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC), and won a £15,000 grant from the Global Challenges Research Fund.

The GIGGA Network project will be profiled as part of Green Great Britain Week by the European and Social Research Council (ESRC). The week, starting 15 October, is a new initiative that seeks to highlight opportunities presented by clean growth and allow the UK government to support climate action.

A video produced by the network on the challenges of governing inclusive green growth in Africa is available here https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCQsxTSp7OinGfGX3uduVQPw?view_as=subscriber

Pay-As-You-Go solar power

In her thesis, Moncayo notes that harnessing solar energy and converting it to off-grid battery power is not a new idea in Africa. She reports that the United Nations Environment Program claims that off-grid lighting solutions are “a multi-billion-dollar market”. At present, reliable and cost-effective Solar Home Systems (SHS) with 20-50 W solar panels that can power LED bulbs and charge a battery are widely available in the region. How are these affordable to the poor Sub-Saharan African population? Moncayo notes that off-grid energy enterprises have adapted their business models to suit their customers. These include Pay-As-You-Go (PAYG) or rent-to-own schemes that allow flexible access to solar energy for as little as 50 US cents per day. Moncayo reports that one of the best-known providers is BBOXX, a start-up founded in 2010 that has now sold over 85,000 systems, reaching 425,000 people, in over 35 countries. Such access to Solar Home Systems has been welcomed as they enable the poorest to save both time and money. Moncayo states in her paper that before they had access to these systems, the typical customer had to spend more money on kerosene for less lighting quality and travel nearly twice a week to charge their phone.

Lack of initial finance

The problem with the schemes currently in place is that they need initial finance.  Moncayo reports payback periods of about 18 months for each system. For a company to achieve financial stability, they need to sell fast and grow fast. However, even when they are able to expand quickly, they have difficulties to pay back short-term loans with their business proceeds. According to Moncayo, philanthropy, public financing, banks, private equity and venture capital have proven unable or unwilling to match Sub-Saharan Africa’s demands to finance off-grid energy. She investigates how impact investments are stepping up to contribute to fill the gap and help to get off-grid power to the masses. Impact investments are investments made in companies, organizations or funds that intend to create positive social and/or environmental impacts, while also attaining a financial return. Moncayo reports that in 2015, from the $16.1 billion supplied by impact investors in West and East Africa, $4.2 billion were dedicated to energy. She notes that most of these did not invest in off-grid options, but those that did are largely multilateral development banks, Development Financial Institutions (DFIs), impact investing funds and corporate impact investors. The support offered by these actors is now also getting ordinary investors interested in off-grid opportunities.

Impact investments are more than finance

Moncayo is also keen to highlight the main non-monetary contributions of impact investors. The first is their obvious contribution to the development and availability of off-grid energy systems. They attract new investors and connect them with providers, including those that are social-neutral. As impact investing is a cooperative, rather than a competitive sector, capital can be aggregated for co-investment, cutting transaction costs. In addition, impact investors can provide off-grid companies with technical assistance and help them grow their networks. Investors get involved in the governance of companies to help preserve their social objectives. Through the impact assessment of their investments, they have the information at hand to further improve the value proposition of enterprises. Overall, the introduction of impact investor capital and management practices strengthens and endorses the entire off-grid sector.

Energy for all by 2030

To attain access to clean energy for all, globally, by 2030, the OECD and the EIA, Energy For All- Financing Access For The Poor report (2011) stated that $48 billion needs to be invested each year. Moncayo notes that, if Sub-Saharan Africa requires 80% of all off-grid electrification, it would need investments of $5.6 billion a year. Based on figures supplied by Bloomberg New Energy Finance, Moncayo estimated that $188 million in impact investments were made in the Sub-Saharan African off-grid energy sector in 2015. This is just 3.3% of that required by the OECD Energy for All Case for that year. Based on projections for the increase in impact investments in the coming years, she predicts that by 2030, the impact investments dedicated to the off-grid energy sector in Sub-Saharan Africa will have the potential to finance 44% of the OECD Energy For All Case annual budget. Moncayo concludes that this is likely to be less than 1% of the estimated multi trillion-dollar impact investments predicted for 2025 by the Global Impact Investing Network. However, she notes that her analysis highlights the power of impact investors, who are emerging as engine for the global economy and key players in tackling the challenges that the world faces today.

By Mónica Moncayo Escobar – “Role of impact investing in financing access to energy for off-grid populations in Sub-Saharan Africa.

Join His Excellency Dr. Bashir Ifo, President, ECOWAS Bank for Investment & Development, Ben Good, Chief Executive Officer, Energy4Impact and other impact investors to discuss how to deliver affordable, reliable and clean energy to over 600 million Africans, faster, at the 3rd Africa Impact Investing Leaders Forum taking place on 25th – 26th October, 2018 in London. Register interest here

By all accounts, engaging the private sector in climate-smart investments will be a cornerstone to growing climate business. In many sectors they already play a large role, supplying nearly a third of global investment in research and development of new renewable energy technologies, or $2.5 billion in 2016 alone. Scaling these technologies up to meet targets set in the Paris climate agreement, however, will require trillions more in innovative climate-smart investments particularly in emerging markets. And this presents us with opportunities. In fact, IFC estimates that 21 developing countries alone hold over $23 trillion in climate-smart investment opportunities through 2030.

The time to capitalize on these opportunities is now. In the words of Michael Bloomberg and Carl Pope, from their recent book, Climate of Hope: “… We believe that by changing the way we think and talk about climate change, we can lower the temperature of the debate – and accomplish a whole lot more.”

And this captures very well what IFC is all about — creating markets, creating and supporting businesses that are financially and environmentally sustainable, and through that, making a difference. Closing off a successful fiscal year in 2017, IFC committed close to $4.8 billion from its own account and mobilized funds from other investors in climate-smart industries, helping scale up climate investments in 41 emerging markets. While these industries are all showing promise, there are five sectors where, based on our experience, innovative approaches are poised to widen the tent, attracting billions in private sector capital.

Unquestionably, meeting future demand for food will be one of the world’s greatest climate-related challenges. The human population is projected to grow from 7.3 billion as of 2015 to 9.7 billion by 2050. Without robust steps to increase productivity and climate resilience of agricultural practices, business-as-usual is expected to reduce global agriculture yields by up to 50 percent by 2030. Fortunately, businesses are beginning to employ climate-smart agriculture measures that can dramatically increase productivity and resilience while reducing greenhouse gas emissions. IFC is focused on helping scale these practices by providing investment and support for specific agribusiness needs, including increasing productivity of animal protein producers, optimizing inputs through precision agriculture, and reducing food waste through investments in logistics and infrastructure.

Another significant impact of global population growth will be the rapid growth of urban environments which will exert pressure on existing building stocks. Buildings are estimated to be responsible for about one third of global greenhouse gas emissions.

This challenge also creates an opportunity for climate-smart investment in green buildings. To help private lenders understand and engage in this opportunity, IFC is helping promote a universal and accessible green performance standard to identify areas for cost savings in buildings. The IFC EDGE program offers developers and investors a free tool to choose options to reduce consumption of energy, water, and extracted materials in new and existing building stock.

As global population and incomes rise, 70 percent of developing country populations are expected to live in cities by 2050. This opens doors for opportunities to build “smart” cities, capable of sustainably meeting demand for infrastructure in urban environments, and private sector interventions are now dramatically changing urban landscapes. In the United States, ride sharing services such as Uber and Lyft are reducing car ownership in cities, which can subsequently reduce congestion and greenhouse gas emissions. IFC is investing in public-private partnerships in Turkey to expand metro rail services and in India to upgrade street lighting networks.

In some of the emerging economies, solar and wind energy technologies are often underutilized because they suffer from variable supply, known as “intermittency.” Energy storage solutions can help reduce these impacts by providing a back-up generation option. New research from IFC suggests that over the coming decade, energy storage technologies will grow 40 percent annually in emerging markets. This growth is likely to unlock significant environmental, social, and economic benefits. IFC is growing this market through early-stage venture capital investments in energy storage markets, ranging from lithium-ion battery technologies to photovoltaic (PV) storage systems.

A critical challenge remains the ability to scale up climate-smart investments bringing new financiers into the climate-smart investment space. For example, institutional investors, comprised of pension funds, insurance companies, and sovereign wealth funds, manage $71.4 trillion in assets but currently play a limited role in global climate finance. To attract these investors, climate-smart projects must offer scale, safety, and simplicity. IFC’s Green Bonds Program has been very successful in engaging these investors, issuing over $5.7 billion in 13 currencies through 74 green bonds on its own balance sheet over the last decade.

Looking Forward

Together, these sectors represent the frontier of climate-smart investment. Innovation in climate-smart agribusiness, green buildings, smart cities, and finance can transform the way global economies function to align with a sustainable future where green growth is a norm, not an exception. By investing its resources in these emerging opportunities, IFC is helping to build the foundations for companies in emerging markets to invest and rapidly grow climate business.

By  ALZBETA KLEIN

The Global Partnership for Education (GPE) Financing Conference that took place in Dakar, Senegal in February 2, 2018 sought US$3.1 billion from world leaders to improve and modernise education on the African continent.  Donors pledged a total of US$2.3 billion for the next years.

Funding, however, is only the first step. A consensus is growing around the idea that to equip the next generation with adequate and relevant skills, we must also reform our education systems.

To compliment this, a proliferation of government and donor-funded projects on entrepreneurship have been set up to teach young people to be job creators instead of job seekers.

One cannot really argue with the current approach, but it falls woefully short of truly addressing the structural aspects of youth unemployment on the continent and disregards the economic structures that exist in most African countries.

In the Gambia, my home country, the ILO estimates that over 75 per cent of total non-agricultural employment is informal.  The World Bank estimates youth unemployment at 43.9 per cent and overall unemployment at almost 30 per cent.

These statistics are due to the formal sector’s inability to absorb enough working age Gambians – a problem that cannot be solved with entrepreneurship and education reform alone.

What The Gambia needs is investment in and promotion of labour-intensive manufacturing. According to the McKinsey Global Institute, sectors such as manufacturing and agriculture could “…speed up job creation [in Africa, and]…boost the number of new wage-paying jobs from 54 million on current trends to 72 million by 2020.” The IMF also noted that efforts to spur industrialisation through labour-intensive light manufacturing is showing positive results in Ethiopia. Despite Ethiopia’s success, the share of manufacturing as a percentage of GDP across the continent has stagnated at around 10 per cent.

For almost two decades, sub-Saharan Africa has seen unprecedented economic growth, but as AfDB President Adesina tweeted, “GDP growth is not enough. Growth must be felt in the lives of people!”

His tweet essentially summarises the need for a different approach, one that is more socially inclusive and improves the livelihoods of the masses. As UNIDO consistently argues, there is a “positive correlation between manufacturing and indicators of social inclusiveness.” As a result, industrial policies that centralise mass job creation, through manufacturing and industrialised agriculture must be pursued in order to avoid the “the real Malthusian crisis”.

Aubrey Hubry postulates that “…the need to generate employment for growing numbers of young people [in Africa] is unprecedented in human history.” Donor organisations, especially the European Union and UNFPA, have identified a link between the crisis Hubry describes in his Financial Times piece and the migration crisis. Both organisations have committed themselves to tackling what they call the economic roots of irregular migration across the Mediterranean.

However, their projects – for instance, the Youth Empowerment Project in The Gambia funded by the EU – do not provide enough capital, technical support or expertise, to address the root causes of poverty and youth unemployment in The Gambia and other African countries.

To conclude, we need to shift the paradigm away from the current status quo, to a tailor-made approach. As eluded to above, efforts to encourage entrepreneurship in The Gambia have had some success and they are essential, but as the founder of Taf Africa Global argues, “entrepreneurship cannot exactly be taught.”

Therefore, efforts to include it in curricula in The Gambia and across the continent are misguided – a move towards re-introducing vocational training in schools would be more suitable.

Funding schemes should be developed for large, scalable business ideas that have tangible potential for mass job creation. Realistically, manufacturing requires certain factors of production that are only available through foreign investment. Consequently, African governments should aim to shrewdly attract investment that secures knowledge and technology transfer, stable and decent employment, and stimulates structural transformation.

A holistic approach is needed though – succeeding with industrial policy requires the prioritisation of STEM (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) subjects in secondary and tertiary educational institutions. It also requires strategic investments in infrastructure, healthcare and as previous highlighted, vocational skills training.

This article is part of the #AfricaAtWork series, looking ahead to the 2018 LSE Africa Summit 20 and 21 April. Follow this link to secure your ticket.

Maudo Jallow (@maudojallow) is the founder of New Nation and former Co-Director of the LSE Africa Summit. He holds an MSc in African Development from the London School of Economics and Political Science.